Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 14:20

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
In bed, not in music, which is better, a drummer or a bass player?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
AI Plays, MercadoLibre Lead Five Stocks Near Buy Points - Investor's Business Daily
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
An unexpected Seahawks player appears in Madden 26 reveal trailer - Field Gulls
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
EchoStar Soars 49% As Trump Urges FCC To Settle Dispute - Investor's Business Daily
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What is the Abu Shusha massacre in Palestine?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Aged neurons don’t respond normally to stress: Study - Parkinson's News Today
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Video: Right, We Need To Talk About GameChat On Switch 2 - Nintendo Life
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.